all Federal Register documents, Fowler and colleagues searched the listed names of organisms, references to the Lacey Act, and references to injurious wildlife to determine which species were listed, considered for listing, and either added or not added to the list. Lacey Act and why is it important? The raid was part of an investigation into the illegal trade of a rare wood species allegedly used in some of Gibsons renowned musical instruments. Point out that the Lacey Act contains no authority or funding to manage the spread of established wild invasive species, which will do little to slow down organisms already present in the. Widely covered in the media, the raid is a wake-up call to all businesses that are part of forest product supply chains that they need to heed the Lacey Act. Or contact: Anne Middleton, Forest Campaign Outreach Coordinator, Environmental Investigation Agency, Adam Grant, Senior Associate, World Resources Institute, Download Fact Sheet: English Chinese Espaol Portugus. When the Lacey Act was passed in 1900, it became the first federal law protecting wildlife.
By Kim Lovell, Contributor. Summary: The Lacey Act prohibits international and domestic wildlife trafficking. The Act makes it a separate crime to trade in wildlife, fish, and plants that have. Summary: This article provides a brief overview of the federal Lacey Act (16.S.C.
Persausive essays on why outsourcing is wrong, My school first day essay in english, Parker henry iv essay hsc,
Cites ) and those protected by State law. Violators can also face forfeiture of their equipment. Congress passed a groundbreaking law banning commerce in illegally sourced plants and their productsincluding timber, wood, and paper products. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. For a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty is 10,000 and/or up to one-year imprisonment. Companies or persons caught with illegally sourced wood or plant products can now be prosecuted and have their goods confiscated. These include the.S. In 1988, the role of guiding or outfitting services were added to cover a new threat to big game species under the ambit of "sale." Prior to the amendment, big game guides who provided illegal hunts were immune to prosecution for violation based on commercial. The maximum civil penalty is 10,000 and includes negligent violations of the Act. However, by March 1, 2007, when the authors wrote the paper, it essay about reinforcement took an average of more that three and a half years to list a species in this way. The study appears in the September issue of Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.